共享单车的利与弊议论

共享单车是指企业与政府合作，在校园、地铁站点、公交站点、居民区、商业区、公共服务区等提供自行车单车共享服务，是共享经济的一种新形态。以下是yjbys为大家提供的共享单车的利与弊议论，希望对大家有所帮助。

The word sharing economy may be a new word for us, and maybe we need more time to share it. Recently, a number of media reports have reported that in public places, some managers have concentrated on the surrounding bikes, for the simple reason that the chaos has affected the public order.

But at the same time, have Shared bicycle users in the interview, said car is sharing a bike everywhere one of the biggest selling point, but the reality is that many places no parking, parking is disorderly parking place. In this case, the user has to stop at a relatively far distance, and the convenience is greatly reduced.

What should we say about this? The supernormal development of new things often reveals the weak foundation.

The media have reported on the latest news about the destruction and the sharing of bicycles. From the "surge", to "pollen", sharing the bicycle to face the embarrassment of warns us: embrace Shared economy, we may not be ready, especially on cultural concept of preparation.

Sharing according to the interpretation of the economist, is refers to the "use rather than having", is under the premise that do not change the ownership of the goods share mode, its advantage is to obtain the maximum utilization of resources. This model fits with the innovative, coordinated, green, open and Shared development concept of China's current efforts. Following the trend of the trend of the first sharing of the bicycle, naturally the media is hot, capital is hot, in a short time to achieve rapid development.

The supernormal development of new things tends to expose the underlying weaknesses. The fact that sharing bicycle frequency is occupied and destroyed proves this truth.

First, the sharing of bicycles faces the embarrassment of institutional undersupport. No rules can't be square. The healthy development of the sharing cycle is inseparable from the perfect internal and external system support. From the enterprise, the sharing cycle operation company should improve the management system constantly. For example, the reward mechanism for establishing honest car and the punishment mechanism of unordered parking. From the government's point of view, the new form and the new business mode of adaptation to the development trend should be supported and standardized, active intervention, rules and regulations and supervision. To disturb the order of roads and urban management order of disorderly parking place, on the one hand, to be both convenient and two aspects of urban management benefit, provide a bicycle parking area, on the other hand, for behavior intentionally destroy, steal a bike, also want to punishment in accordance with the law, in the maintenance of the interests of the enterprise at the same time, enlarge the warning effect. Objectively speaking, in terms of media reflection, neither has done enough.

Secondly, the sharing of bicycles faces the awkwardness of the ideological and cultural foundation. Elderly men will share bicycle circle KanGuanFei, children vandalized the bicycle, this may not only is a matter of inhibited the lack of personal morals, lust, and others, but reflects our citizen accomplishment. There are some weak links and morality education. Sharing is "use, not ownership", and the premise of sharing is recognition and respect for the rights of others. The sense of right consciousness and integrity is the foundation of the idea that the sharing economy is fully developed, and the culture of culture and culture is the cultural soil of sharing economic prosperity and development. If we ignore the cultivation of ideological culture, the development of Shared economy will become the tower of sand, and the single-soldier advance of sharing bicycles will die. This is the most important problem to confront Shared cycle development.

In the face of outstanding new problems, it is not only the simple provision of national personal qualities, but also the government supervision, social supervision and other aspects. Today's focus is not just on the new thing about sharing a bicycle, but the new things that are associated with the sharing economy.

We look forward to a new life in China.

共享经济一词也许对我们来说是一个新词，在共享这一问题上也许我们需要更多的时间来接受。近来，有多家媒体报道，在公共场所，有相关管理人员对周边单车进行了集中收缴，理由很简单，乱停乱放影响了公共场所的秩序。

但同时，有共享单车用户接受在采访时表示，随地还车本来就是共享单车一个最大的卖点，但现实情况是，很多地方无停车点，停放就是乱停乱放。这种情况下，用户不得不到相对较远的地方去停车，便利性大大降低。

对于这个问题，我们应该怎么看?新事物的超常规发展，往往会暴露基础的薄弱。

媒体近日报道了多起破坏、霸占共享单车的新闻。从“狂飙突进”，到遭遇“倒春寒”，共享单车面临的尴尬警示我们：拥抱共享经济，我们可能还没有做好准备，特别是文化观念上的准备。

按照经济学家的解释，共享是指“使用而非拥有”，是在不改变物品所有权前提下的分享模式，其优点在于使资源获得最大限度的利用。这种模式与我国当前努力推行的创新、协调、绿色、开放、共享的发展理念恰相契合。顺应潮流又开风气之先的共享单车，自然而然地受媒体热炒、资本热捧，在短时间内取得了快速的发展。

新事物的超常规发展，往往会暴露基础的薄弱。共享单车频遭霸占、破坏的事实，就印证了这个道理。

首先，共享单车面临着制度支撑不足的尴尬。没有规矩不成方圆。共享单车要健康发展，离不开完善的内外部的制度支撑。从企业来说，共享单车运营公司要不断完善管理体系。比如，建立诚信用车的奖励机制和不当用车、无序停车的惩罚机制。从政府部门来说，对于适应发展趋势的新形式、新业态，应该扶持与规范并重，主动介入，制定规则，加强监管。对于扰乱道路秩序和城市管理秩序的乱停乱放问题，一方面要兼顾便民和城市管理两个方面利益，提供单车停放区域，另一方面，对于故意毁坏、窃取单车的行为，也要依法处罚，在维护企业利益的同时，放大警示效应。客观说，从媒体反映情况来看，这两方面做得都不够。

其次，共享单车面临着观念文化基础不牢的尴尬。大爷大妈将共享单车圈起来收看管费，孩子肆意破坏单车，这可能不单单是个别人私德缺失、私欲作祟的问题，而是反映出我们在公民素养和公德教育上还有薄弱环节。共享是“使用而非拥有”，共享的前提是对他人权利的`承认和尊重。权利意识和诚信意识，是共享经济得以充分发展的观念根基，法治文化和诚信文化是共享经济繁荣发展的文化土壤。如果忽视了思想文化的土壤培育，共享经济的发展就会成为沙上建塔，共享单车的单兵推进就会夭折。这才是应对共享单车发展难题最需要直面的问题。

面对突出的新问题，不仅仅是提供国民个人素质这么简单，更关注到政府监管、社会监督等其他方面。今日关注的重点不仅仅只是共享单车这一新事物，日后与共享经济相关的其他新事物都会层出不穷。

我们期待中国未来的共享新生活。