公共英语pets5写作范文2017
业精于勤，荒于嬉;行成于思，毁于随。以下本站小编整理的公共英语pets5写作范文，希望对大家有所帮助，更多信息请关注应届毕业生网!
Since the 1960s, debates have been fueled on the ideal means of communication. Some observers, free lancers and columnists in particular, often emphasize that the more friends one has on line, the fewer one has in his life. However, through decades of practice and observation, it turns out that their statement has many restrictions.
Admittedly, the idea held by those observers does contain an element of truth. For example, along with the computer boom, Internet, the gem of twentieth century scientific technology, is playing an increasingly important role in the means of communication. But these arguers tend to ignore two other essential aspects. First, they fail to take into account the possibility that a variety of technical devices are available. As a result, people can resort to telephones or faxes to maintain a more intimate human relationship. In this sense, the popularity of Internet is not always synonymous to the emotional isolations between people. Second, the arguers’ assertion doesn’t provide sufficient data to narrow down the exact number of computer users who seldom contact their parents or colleagues. Therefore, any further conclusion addressing the problem must be based on thorough investigation. As a matter of fact, dinner parties, celebrating parties as well as other social activities always successfully bring people together. In this respect, the upsurge of electric contact is not the sole hallmark of the decrease of closed n reasons above, the argument above, under a careful examination, turns out to be groundless in its hasty conclusion.
In conclusion, the arguers’ evidence lends little credible support to their claim. To persuade people that the more friends one has on line, the fewer friends one has in his life, the arguers would need to provide clear evidence, sufficient data and thorough cost-benefit analysis of alternatives.(297 words)
译文：
自1960年代以来,争论一直在推动理想的通讯手段。一些观察人士,特别是自由枪骑兵和专栏作家,经常强调的更多的朋友,更少的人在他的生活中。然而,通过几十年的实践和观察,事实证明,他们的声明有许多限制。
诚然,这些观察人士持有的想法并包含一个元素的真理。例如,随着计算机的繁荣,互联网,二十世纪科学技术的`宝石,发挥着日益重要的角色的沟通方式。但这些争论者倾向于忽视其他两个基本方面。首先,他们没有考虑各种技术设备的可能性。因此,人们可以采取电话或传真来维持一个更亲密的人际关系。从这个意义上说,互联网的普及并不总是代表人与人之间情感的分解动作。第二,辩论者的论断没有提供足够的数据来缩小计算机用户的确切数字很少接触他们的父母或同事。因此,任何进一步的结论解决问题必须基于彻底的调查。事实上,宴会,庆祝聚会以及其他社会活动总是成功地把人们团结在一起。在这方面,电接触的高潮并不是唯一的标志的减少封闭的朋友。鉴于以上原因,上面的论点,在仔细检查下,草率的结论被证明是毫无根据的。
总之,辩论者的证据却很少可信支持他们的说法。要说服人们,更多的朋友,朋友越少人在他的生活中,辩论者需要提供明确的证据,足够的数据和彻底的替代品的成本效益分析。
